?

Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The Two Star Review

When I'm looking at something (a video game? A book? Anti-Obama movies) I find clusters of 1 or 5 star reviews that are, generally, meaningless (if the thing has all of one or the other or a massive shift, well, okay--but if there's only a few it doesn't mean that much). As a rule:

5 Star - HAPPY!! I AM UNCRITICAL!! IT CAME! IT CAME!
4 Star - Ain't no such thing as a 10! (the reviewer likes it but doesn't hand out 5-stars ... no sir!)
3 Star - Believer in the law of averages. The reviewer considers themselves measured and logical. Or, perhaps, whatever it was just didn't impress ... but did not rot their privates off either.
2 Star - This is a person who is critical--very critical--but not affronted.
1 Star - WAHHHHHAAA! Y U NO MEET MY DEMANDS!! I PUNISH YOU NOWW!! I R IMPORTANT!!!!!

So I'm interested in the two-star reviews. It doesn't mean they're the most insightful (I will take the average of stars for meaning--and I'll usually look at the 1-star reviews to see what a "worst case scenario" would look like)--but I'm interested in the thinking of someone who would write a 2-star review.

As a collary it's my belief that when trying to whack someone, the 2-star review is more meaningful than a 1-star: it drags the average down but it doesn't look political.

(This post came to me while reading reviews of David Frum's Why Romney Lost book--which has around 70 reviews but exactly 1 two-star review).
http://www.amazon.com/Why-Romney-Lost-ebook/product-reviews/B00A3EOVKS